The effect of BCM guided dry weight assessment on short-term survival in Chinese hemodialysis patients : Primary results of a randomized trial - BOdy COmposition MOnitor (BOCOMO) study.

Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, China. Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, China. Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, Capital Medical University Fuxing Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. Nephrotic Blood Purification Center, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China. Department of Nephrology, Beijing Miyun County Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. Department of Nephrology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, Beijing Boai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Captain Medical University, Rehabilitation Medical College, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of Nephrology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. zuoli@bjmu.edu.cn.

BMC nephrology. 2020;(1):135
Full text from:

Abstract

BACKGROUND Lack of accurate and effective assessment tools of fluid status is one of the major challenges to reach proper dry weight (DW) in chronic hemodialysis (HD) population. The aim of this randomized study was to evaluate the effect of bioimpedance guided DW assessment on long-term outcomes in Chinese HD patients. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to two groups in each center, the control group and body composition monitor (BCM) group. In the BCM group, DW has been evaluated by bioimpedance technic every 2 months during follow-up. The primary composite endpoint consisted of death, acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, and peripheral vascular disease. METHODS A total of 445 patients were recruited from 11 hemodialysis centers from Beijing, Tianjin and Shijiazhuang cities from Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2014. They were randomized into either BCM group or control group. All patients have been followed up for 1 year or until Dec 31, 2014 or censoring. RESULTS At baseline, there were no significant differences between two groups in terms of demographic parameters, dialysis vintage, percentage of vascular access, and comorbid conditions. At the end of the study, 18 (4.04%) patients had died (11 in control group and 7 in BCM group). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in survival rates between two groups (log-rank test P = 0.07). However, there was an increasing trend of survival rates in BCM group compared to the control group. In the multivariable Cox analysis, there was a nonsignificant trend toward less primary composite end points in the BCM group in the adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio was impressive (0.487, 95% CI 0.217-1.091, P = 0.08). CONCLUSION Bioimpedance technic has been applied to assess fluid status for decades and has been proved to be a promising tool for clinical practice. Although short-term outcomes were not improved in the randomized, controlled trial, the ascending trend in survival has been observed. Further studies are needed to investigate the survival benefit of bioimpedance method in DW assessment in a larger sample with longer follow-up period. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.org, NCT01509937. Registered 13 January 2012.

Methodological quality

Metadata